Vector Approaching Technique
Based on the new definition of Alpha, combined with the principle of Force and Magnification…
Step 1: Find hot girl.
Step 2: Look hot girl up and down.
Step 3: Imagine her smiling and introducing herself to you.
Step 4: Ask yourself, “If she liked me, how would she want me to approach her?”
Step 5: Smile and do it.
Captain Jack
P.S. Do it and let me know how it goes in the comments!
P.P.S. Master Strategies Monthly guys, can you see how this technique was derived from the material in the audios? Can you see why it works?
Force21 -
Crack the Back of Your Most Persistent Sticking Points, Go to A Level Never Seen Before...
I have created a program to help you crack the back of your most persistent sticking points. It is called Force*21 and it has the potential to spring you to the next level in a mere 21 days.
Force*21 Is not a bunch of theory. It is not a bunch of rehashed techniques. It is the application of my newest technology to YOUR Game with me as a guide.
It will crack the back of your most persistent sticking points and spring you to the next level.
I want you to have my new technology.
I want you to get to this level, too.
>>> Click Here to Learn More About Captain Jack's FORCE21 Program <<<
See Related Posts
- Force*21 [15.0352]
- How to Get Back at Your Ex [14.983]
- How to Meet, Attract and Seduce Women Using Game Dynamics [13.1628]
- “I met your twin last night.” [13.0932]
- Ability Creation in Pick-up [12.7604]
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
haven’t tried it yet, but i would just smile and say hi
With this in mind. would you still apply the priciples of active and passive attraction? I am somebody who relies on things like teasing and such to gain attraction intially but with this priciple it seems you would go into a more comfort based approahed from the start if your assuming the girl is attracted to you because you will be assuming she is attracted to you and dont have to build it up. Ive learned that hasnt worked for me in the past and this is the reason i use teasing and other things first.
Hello cj, thank you for your insights. I’ve been trying game dynamics and sexual framing dancing in a club but it’s quite difficult to do a rings on finger there. Also, it’s like I’m doing everything well except sexual framing up to the point that I have to stop not to fuck up the set. When I do SF, I’m entering in a logic mode, similar to an interview.
I will keep trying your stuff based on your very useful posts. However, I would like to know how to apply sexual framing and game dynamics in the following scenarios:
a) dancing clubs
b) social circle
It would be a pleasure to understand that.
Thanks CJ!
The point of this is to NOT think of it in any way other than with the question applied in real-time.
Does she know anything about the principles of active and passive attraction?
Does she know anything about what has and hasn't worked for you in the past?
Empty mind.
Owen:
The Dance Floor is a tough place to be, def. not ideal. The girls attention simply isn't where it needs to be, because they want to dance! So as soon as you think she'll comply, move her to some place more quite. Then you can do the SF.
Also, you've already stated what you're doing wrong. Don't be logic, appeal to the emotions! (tease, don't give the answers away right away)
Ex.
You:Ahh interesting..
HB: What what?
You: I'll tell you in a bit.. blablabla
You should really, really watch out applying SF inside you social circle. Ofcourse the anti LTR-framesetter is a topic you can introduce without too much suspicion, but don't go strawberry fiels on your friends. You risk losing your social circle.
CJ: What can I say, pure awesomeness. Your stuff is mindboggling.
I like how you always strive to get at higher ideas.
And it's been said with NLP / hypnosis to go first, and I thought it's something similar. The result of internalizing that she likes you should be that you feel that sexual attraction / tension in yourself first, and if all your actions are from the subconscious, this should get you into sexual topics / framing (and your magnification principals) automatically (or atleast help to get there).
So I'd like to add, get in touch with the good emotions of being attracted, and things will autocorrect themselves.
Good work either way!
The point of this is to NOT think of it in any way other than with the question applied in real-time.
Does she know anything about the principles of active and passive attraction?
Does she know anything about what has and hasn’t worked for you in the past?
Empty mind.
I tried the technique over the weekend with varying results. I found myself assuming that girls were attracted to me when they werent and i was going in with a more comfort approach which wasnt working and found myself going backwrds to build up some attration. I see what your saying because this technique would give confidence on the approach and not get urself into ur head but thats not really my problem. With me its more about being somewhat disqualified and having to use my personality to gain the attraction and this technique doesnt seem to work for me because i have to use those attraction qualities first before i can just get into some basic comfort talk. Regardless wether the girl knows about pasive/ active attraction or what has worked for me in the past. I will continue to try it though as maybe im missing something.
Hey CJ,
I was reading through some of your old posts and found something interesting. In the post “On NOT Gaming Part Deux” you say that “No one has any business working on InnerGame until they’ve done about 1000 sets.”
Recently our posts have been focused a lot on inner game, have you changed your opinion about working on inner game? If so, why?
Thanks!
BTW, I love your posts!